Summary: Maryland’s mandatory minimum sentencing law has put ninety percent of black repeat drug offenders behind bars “even though national rates of substance dependence and drug dealing among blacks and whites are virtually identical.”
Topic: Mandatory minimum’s inequality towards races.
Category: Journalism
What is it? News report from MSNBC.com
Title: Report: Md. drug sentences unfair to blacks
Publication Information: MSNBC.com, Feb. 28, 2007. IMAGE: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/05/06/us/0506-nat-webDISPARITIES.jpg.
Author: Does not say
Location: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17357576/
Accessed: January 23, 2009
Support:
- Washington-based group that promotes alternatives to incarceration
- Justice Policy institute
- Drug Free America Foundation Inc.
- State Delegate Curtis S. Anderson
- Associated Press
- Justice Policy Institute Executive Director Jason Ziedenberg
- Drug Free America Executive Director Calvina Fay
These sources represent the knowledge of the law and how it is used. They also represent the people who are affected by the laws put into place under mandatory minimums.
Source Analysis: MSNBC is a news site that is intended for all different purposes ranging from hard news to entertainment.
Usefulness: This article tells how mandatory minimums are being used. It shows how the system works in color and has hierarchy and its own stratification. One source noted that the majority of blacks being sent behind bars was due to money issues with finding a good lawyer or not, which technically isn’t the system’s fault. But it shows the relatonship between race and the laws that were meant to be objective.
Works Cited: MSNBC.com at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17357576/. http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/05/06/us/0506-nat-webDISPARITIES.jpg.
Summary: New policies are being used to exponge Reagan-era mandatory minimums to keep more drug users out of prison and put into rehab.
Topic: Mandatory minimums–are they useful or are they outdated?
Category: Journalistic
What is it? News report from CNN.com
Title: Mandatory, Minimum, and Mislead
Publication Information: CNN.com, Februray 15, 2008
Author: Niko Karvounis
Location: http://www.motherjones.com/news_analysis/2008/02/mandatory-minimum-and-misguided.html
Accessed: January 23, 2009
Support:
- Senate Judiciary Subcommittee
- Attorney General Michael Mukasey
- US Attorney Gretchen Shappert
- US Sentencing Commission
- Justice Department
- Bush Administration
- Senator Joe Biden
- US Conference of Mayors
- Then-Speaker of House (1986) Tip O’Neill
- Ronald and Nancy Reagan
- Supreme Court
- Hillary Clinton
- Barack Obama
- John McCain
The use of these sources is where all the laws and acts come from. The laws and acts are in response to the outstanding number of drug abusers going to prison instead of receiving help with an addiction. The laws are to help the citizens, not to out-punish the other party like in the Reagan era.
Source Analysis: This article was a search powered by google on CNN.com.
Usefulness: This report was based around the alarming number of people going to jail for crack-cocaine, but also if congress retracts the laws against mandatory minimums, if could mean that many, many prisoners will be let free. What the story is saying is that judges are able to decide who gets to leave and who needs to stay. But congress and many others are working on laws and acts to help drug offenders at the beginning and lessening their chances of becoming repeats. Many believe that the war on drugs has failed, and mandatory minimums are not keeping drug users off the streets once they’ve been released.
Works Cited: CNN.com, http://www.motherjones.com/news_analysis/2008/02/mandatory-minimum-and-misguided.html
Summary: Mandatory minimums are failing the US. They are failing to deter crime, have worsened racial and gender disparity, and contributed greatly to prison overcrowding. They shift decision-making authority from judges to prosecutors, who operate without accountability.
Topic: The uselessness of mandatory minimums.
Category: Journalistic
What is it? Defining problems with the war on drugs from the Drug Policy Alliance Network through CNN.com
Title: Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Publication Information: CNN.com, no date. IMAGE: http://www.prisonersofthecensus.org/images/race_us_prison.jpg.
Author: does not say
Location: http://www.drugpolicy.org/drugwar/mandatorymin/
Accessed: January 25, 2009
Support:
- Congress
- Judges
- US Sentencing Commission
- Department of Justice
- US Bureau of Prisons Director Kathleen Hawk-Sawyer
These are the laws coming from the source. Hawk-Sawyer really is a primary source because she has witnessed the mandatory minimum laws fail time and time again right in front of her.
Source Analysis: This is more of an awareness website to help find information on an issue.
Usefulness: It’s important because it helps define this type of sentencing objectively rather than through a specific story. After reading this article I can start to understand why this system of mandatory minimums is failing.
Works Cited: CNN.com, http://www.drugpolicy.org/drugwar/mandatorymin/. http://www.prisonersofthecensus.org/images/race_us_prison.jpg.
Summary: Republicans are trying to solidify mandatory minimums in the sentencing process, as they haven’t been used as seriously. Many judges consider the penalties a mere suggestion. “The Bush Administration should be spending more money on local police to battle crime rather than proposing a large-scale and premature overhaul of our sentencing system.”
Topic: Many Republicans plan to re-enforce mandatory minimums to help clean up the streets
Category: Journalistic
What is it? News report from CBSnews.com
Title: Bush Seeks to Re-Impose Mandatory Minimums
Publication Information: CBSnews.com, June 13, 2o07
Author: Lindsay Goldwert
Location: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/13/politics/main2924206_page2.shtml
Accessed: Jan. 26, 2009
Support:
- Bush Administration
- Supreme Court
- Justice Department
- Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
- US District Judge Paul G. Cassell, Chairman of the Criminal Law Committee of the Judicial Conference
- Douglas Berman, Ohio State University sentencing expert
- Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee
- Washington defense attorney Michael Horowitz
- Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy
These are the people who are defending the laws or trying to change them and have first hand accounts of the criminals who are punished through these laws, so they are taking into consideration everything they have witnessed.
Source Analysis: CBS news is a website that give the news similarly to MSNBC and ABC.
Usefulness: This is helpful in seeing how different types of people respond to the laws made and enforced. Many people want harsher laws for people who have broken the laws. And other people want to help those people who broke the law in the first place because of the bad hand they were dealt .
Works Cited: CBSnews.com, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/13/politics/main2924206_page2.shtml
Summary: Many people, both Democrat and Republican, oppose mandatory minimums because they cost a lot and are putting nonviolent offenders behind bars. The purpose of mandatory minimums in the 80s was to capture the drug kingpins and, instead, regular drug dealers and users are the ones overcrowding the jails.
Topic: The purpose of mandatory minimums
Category: Journalistic
What is it? News article from google
Title: Poll: 60 percent of Americans oppose mandatory minimum sentences
Publication information: The Christian Science Monitor, Sept. 25, 2008
Author: Amanda Paulson
Location: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0925/p02s01-usju.html
Accessed: January 28, 2009
Support:
- Julie Stewart, president and founder of FAMM
- US Sentencing Commission
- Attorney General Michael Mukasey
- Fraternal Order of Police
- Jim Pasco, executive director of FOP
- James Alan Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University in Boston
- Molly Gill, FAMM report author
These sources are fighting for each decision to be passed or not. They study the criminals and can decide, first hand, what policy works best for their situation.
Source Analysis: I found this site through google, I hope it is legitimate.
Usefulness: The sources are primary, which makes their opinion on sentencing more plausible. I like this article because it gives the reasons why people don’t like the mandatory minimums, but it also has ways of backing it up.
Works Cited: The Christian Science Monitor, http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0925/p02s01-sju.html